<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OMG, it looks editorial!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepoliticsofsystems.net/2008/07/01/omg-it-looks-editorial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepoliticsofsystems.net/2008/07/01/omg-it-looks-editorial/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Power and Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:48:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joris van Hoboken</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticsofsystems.net/2008/07/01/omg-it-looks-editorial/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Joris van Hoboken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticsofsystems.net/2008/07/01/omg-it-looks-editorial/#comment-220</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Digg and the &#8216;Non-Editorial&#8217; Fragmentation Machine...&lt;/strong&gt;

Bernhard Rieder points to an interesting interview about a not so surprising recommendation technology rolled out by Digg. The recommendations engine compares a user&#8217;s &#8216;digging&#8217; of stories to the digging of others, while stories are b...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Digg and the &#8216;Non-Editorial&#8217; Fragmentation Machine&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Bernhard Rieder points to an interesting interview about a not so surprising recommendation technology rolled out by Digg. The recommendations engine compares a user&#8217;s &#8216;digging&#8217; of stories to the digging of others, while stories are b&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
