<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Politics of Systems &#187; recomendation engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepoliticsofsystems.net/tag/recomendation-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepoliticsofsystems.net</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Software, Power, and Digital Method</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>OMG, it looks editorial!</title>
		<link>http://thepoliticsofsystems.net/2008/07/omg-it-looks-editorial/</link>
		<comments>http://thepoliticsofsystems.net/2008/07/omg-it-looks-editorial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bernhard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[algorithms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anton kast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recomendation engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepoliticsofsystems.net/2008/07/01/omg-it-looks-editorial/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is not a substantial post just a pointer to this interview with Digg lead scientist Anton Kast on Digg’s upcoming recommendation engine (which is really just collaborative filtering but as Kast says the engineering challenge is to make it work in real time &#8211; which is quite fascinating given the volume of users and]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a substantial post just a pointer to <a href="http://mashable.com/2008/06/30/digg-recommendation-engine/" target="_blank">this interview</a> with Digg lead scientist Anton Kast on Digg’s upcoming recommendation engine (which is really just collaborative filtering but as Kast says the engineering challenge is to make it work in real time &#8211; which is quite fascinating given the volume of users and content on the site). Around 2:50 Kast explains why Digg will list the “compatibility coefficient” (<a href="http://thepoliticsofsystems.net/2008/03/25/my-internet-research-90-proposal-algorithmic-proximity/" target="_blank">algorithmic proximity</a> anyone?) with other users and give an indication why stories are recommended to you (because<em> these</em> users dug them): Digg users hate getting stuff imposed  and just showing recommendations without a trail “looks editorial”. Wow, “editorial” is becoming a swearword. Who would have thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepoliticsofsystems.net/2008/07/omg-it-looks-editorial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

